Case Summary
Vinod E.N is the plaintiff, and Rajamohanan and others are the defendants. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to file necessary documentation.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to appear and provide necessary documentation for the suit.
Plaintiff failed to appear and provide necessary documentation for the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to appear and provide necessary documentation for the suit.
Plaintiff failed to appear and provide necessary documentation for the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation. No proof affidavit filed. No application filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for non prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vinod E.N
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o Natarajan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajamohanan
- Party Age
- 82
- Relation
- S/o Krishnan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Prameela Rajamohanan
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- W/o Rajamohanan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Priya
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- D/o Sarada
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Deepu Viswanath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C.S. Ajithan Nampoothiri
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for non prosecution.
Evidence:
Hencee suit is dismissed for non prosecution.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2022