Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 151/2016

Case between Vijayan Nair vs Mini Rajan regarding perpetual injunction

Court
The Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vijayan Nair has filed a suit against Mini Rajan seeking a perpetual injunction to prevent her from trespassing on his property. The plaintiff claims he has been in possession of the property and that the defendant has attempted to interfere with his rights.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff was not entitled to the relief of perpetual injunction as the property in question was not identifiable or properly demarcated. Therefore, the suit was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The property was not identifiable or properly demarcated.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit stands dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Vijayan Nair (69 years) Ambalaparambu House, Marottichodu Bhagam, Vengola Kara, Arackapady Village

Defendants

Mini Rajan (47 years) Aaramam House, Nayathodu P.O., Opp. N.S.S., Mattoor Airport Road, Nayathodu Bhagam, Angamaly Village

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff requested a perpetual injunction to restrain the defendant from trespassing.
Evidence:
Even though there is no dispute regarding the possession of the property by the plaintiff, the plaintiff could not be found to be entitled for the relief of perpetual injunction, as the property is not identifiable.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the partition deed vested property rights to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of tax payment for the property, supporting the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of possession of the property by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: FIR
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the police complaint regarding the defendant's trespass.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Additional evidence of tax payment for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Decree
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of the decree related to the defendant's mother’s property.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report that includes a rough sketch of the property and its boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission report and Survey plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Detailed report and survey plan regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases