Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.51/2017

Case between Vijayan et al vs Divakaran Nair regarding dismissal for default.

Court
THE MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-07-15
Duration
Case Code No.
51
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Vijayan, Usha, and Sulochana, filed a suit against the defendant Divakaran Nair. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was absent.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Since Plaintiff absent, Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijayan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Usha
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sulochana
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rugmini
Party Age
72
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bhanumathy
Party Age
70
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Divakaran Nair
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.A. Ashraf
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.K. Sindhu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sajeev R.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N.C Mohanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Haseemkhan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to the absence of the Plaintiff.
Evidence:
Since Plaintiff absent, Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. Keezhillam Branch vs Anagha Mariya Siby et al regarding suit dismissal
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Ameena Makkar et al vs Aji et al regarding Suit dismissal for default
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won