Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
I.A No. 1/2025 in os 483/2025

Case between Vijayakumar K S vs T M Saseendran regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-12-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vijayakumar K S filed a petition for an ad interim injunction against T M Saseendran regarding the functioning of Vijaya Thattukada. The court granted the injunction restraining the respondent from trespassing and obstructing the functioning.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the petitioner's request for an ad interim injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the property in question.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad interim injunction granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted the petitioner's request for an ad interim injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the property in question.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found a prima facie case and determined that delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the application.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found a prima facie case and determined that delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the application.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out and delay in issuing notice would defeat the very purpose of the above application.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence ad interim injunction is granted and the respondent is restrained from causing obstruction to the smooth functioning of Vijaya Thattukada in the plaint schedule item no. 1 property and is restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule item no. 1 property and from committing waste there in until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijayakumar K S
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T M Saseendran
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santhosh Thomas Kandamchira
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad interim injunction is granted and the respondent is restrained from causing obstruction to the smooth functioning of Vijaya Thattukada.
Evidence:
Hence ad interim injunction is granted and the respondent is restrained from causing obstruction to the smooth functioning of Vijaya Thattukada in the plaint schedule item no. 1 property and is restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule item no. 1 property and from committing waste there in until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vijayakumar K S vs T M Saseendran regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Vijayakumar K S vs T M Saseendran regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Pathorse vs Ambily M B et al regarding injunction against trespassing and demolition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Uthup K Thomas vs Jayakumar K et al regarding injunction
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Joby P M vs Sony P M regarding order of injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between P.K.Vijayan vs Vijeesh Vijayan et al regarding mandatory injunction rectification
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate - IV, Kottayam
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Mathew Thomas vs Jince Joy et al regarding Injunction
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Injunction Plaintiff Won