Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP 1/2025

Case between P.K.Vijayan vs Vijeesh Vijayan et al regarding mandatory injunction rectification

Court
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate - IV, Kottayam
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R
Order Date
2025-02-03
Duration
Case Code No.
1
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P.K.Vijayan is the petitioner seeking a mandatory injunction against Vijeesh Vijayan and others. The court noted an inadvertent mistake in the decree which needed rectification to direct the defendants to vacate the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court acknowledged an inadvertent mistake in the decree denying the mandatory injunction. It directed the defendants to vacate the property as articulated in the rectified decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to vacate from the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court acknowledged an inadvertent mistake in the decree denying the mandatory injunction. It directed the defendants to vacate the property as articulated in the rectified decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court identified an inadvertent error in the previous decree that necessitated correction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court identified an inadvertent error in the previous decree that necessitated correction.
Supporting Evidence
It was an inadvertent mistake. Hence it has to be rectified.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, in the decretal portion, incorporate, The defendants are hereby directed to vacate from the plaint schedule property. Petition is allowed accordingly.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.K.Vijayan
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijeesh Vijayan
Party Age
40
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sumesh
Party Age
40
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Varghese
Party Age
65
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are hereby directed to vacate from the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence, in the decretal portion, incorporate, The defendants are hereby directed to vacate from the plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Johny Joseph vs Abdul Raheem @ K. M. R. Guru et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Pathorse vs Ambily M B et al regarding injunction against trespassing and demolition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Uthup K Thomas vs Jayakumar K et al regarding injunction
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Joby P M vs Sony P M regarding order of injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Mathew Thomas vs Jince Joy et al regarding Injunction
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Injunction Plaintiff Won