Case Summary
The case involves Vijayakuamaran Nair as the plaintiff seeking declaration and injunction against Bank of Baroda. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent with no representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide representation.
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide representation.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide representation.
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide representation.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Defect not cured. Plaintiff called absent, no representation on his part. Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vijayakuamaran Nair
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bank of Baroda
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R.R. Sajeesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
declaration and injunction u/s 26 Order VII Rule I of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for declaration and injunction u/s 26 Order VII Rule I of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vijayakuamaran Nair vs Bank of Baroda regarding declaration and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Vijayakuamaran Nair vs Bank of Baroda regarding declaration and injunction