Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 259 OF 2018

Case between Vijaya Bank vs Satheesan regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-07-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vijaya Bank, represented by its Branch Manager, filed a suit against Satheesan for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendant defaulted on repayment despite repeated demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 57,350 with interest from the defendant. Costs of the suit are also to be borne by the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is allowed to realise an amount of Rs.57,350 with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 57,350 with interest from the defendant. Costs of the suit are also to be borne by the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved its case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved its case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained unchallenged. I find no reason to disbelieve PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is allowed to realise an amount of Rs.57,350 with interest at the rate of 11.65% per annum till realisation from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijaya Bank
Relation
Rep. By its Branch Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Satheesan
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o Velayudhan
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application dated 22-09-2016, Demand Promissory Note dated 27-09-2016, Letter of Repayment dated 27-09-2016, Agreement for Loan Scheme dated 27-09-2016, True copy of lawyer notice dated 4-7-2017, Copy of statement of accounts showing the details of loan transaction.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.V.Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is allowed to recover an amount of Rs.57,350/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I The plaintiff is allowed to realise an amount of Rs.57,350/-.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
II. Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the loan application made by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document executed by the defendant promising to pay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of Repayment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document outlining the terms for repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement for Loan Scheme
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement executed by the defendant agreeing to repay the loan with interest.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued by the plaintiff to the defendant regarding the loan default.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing details of the loan transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Vijaya Bank vs Satheesan regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Vijaya Bank vs Satheesan regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 09/27/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Pushpa.M.V. regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Shahul Hameed regarding money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Mahesh kumar.P.P. regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sabira et al regarding money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shihabudheen et al regarding money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Dismissed