Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 303 OF 2018

Case between Vijaya Bank, Tirur Branch vs Beeran Mohammedkutty et al regarding realization of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-07-18
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vijaya Bank filed a suit against Beeran Mohammedkutty and Ramla for the recovery of a loan amount of Rs. 73,044/- due to non-repayment. The defendants did not appear in court and thus the case was decided in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the entire claimed amount of Rs. 73,044/- along with interest from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 73,044/- with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved their case by providing reliable evidence and the defendants failed to challenge the claims against them.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 73,044/- (Rupees Seventy Three Thousand and Forty Four only) with interest at the rate of 11.25 % per annum compound monthly till toady and at the rate of 6 % per annum till the realization, from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Vijaya Bank, Tirur Branch (Age not specified years) Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Beeran Mohammedkutty (58 years years) Mannarattil House, Kottachira, B.P.Angadi, Thalakkad amsom desom, Tirur Taluk Ramla (50 years years) Mannarattil House, Kottachira, B.P.Angadi, Thalakkad amsom desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 73,044/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
Therefore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence. Hence the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that the first defendant applied for a loan of Rs. 50,000/- on 08.09.2007.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the sanction of the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of Repayment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Specifies the repayment terms agreed upon by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of guarantee
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as a guarantee for the loan provided.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the hypothecation terms securing the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgement of liability
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicate the liability acknowledged by the defendants over several years.
Reference:
Ext.A7 to A10
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copies of the notices sent to the defendants regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A11, Ext.A12
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the details of the loan transaction and outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A13

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Thu, 09/13/2007 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases