Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 303 OF 2018

Case between Vijaya Bank, Tirur Branch vs Beeran Mohammedkutty et al regarding realization of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-07-18
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 07/18/2019 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vijaya Bank filed a suit against Beeran Mohammedkutty and Ramla for the recovery of a loan amount of Rs. 73,044/- due to non-repayment. The defendants did not appear in court and thus the case was decided in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the entire claimed amount of Rs. 73,044/- along with interest from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 73,044/- with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the entire claimed amount of Rs. 73,044/- along with interest from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved their case by providing reliable evidence and the defendants failed to challenge the claims against them.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved their case by providing reliable evidence and the defendants failed to challenge the claims against them.
Supporting Evidence
Since the defendant remained ex parte, the evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained unchallenged. I find no reason to disbelieve PW1. Therefore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 73,044/- (Rupees Seventy Three Thousand and Forty Four only) with interest at the rate of 11.25 % per annum compound monthly till toady and at the rate of 6 % per annum till the realization, from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijaya Bank, Tirur Branch
Relation
Rep. By its Branch Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Beeran Mohammedkutty
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramla
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application, Loan Sanction Letter, Letter of Repayment, Letter of Guarantee, Articles of Agreement, Hypothecation Agreement, Acknowledgement of liabilities, copies of lawyer notices, statement of accounts.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.V.Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 73,044/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
Therefore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence. Hence the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that the first defendant applied for a loan of Rs. 50,000/- on 08.09.2007.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the sanction of the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of Repayment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Specifies the repayment terms agreed upon by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of guarantee
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as a guarantee for the loan provided.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the hypothecation terms securing the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgement of liability
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicate the liability acknowledged by the defendants over several years.
Reference:
Ext.A7 to A10
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copies of the notices sent to the defendants regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A11, Ext.A12
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the details of the loan transaction and outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A13

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Vijaya Bank, Tirur Branch vs Beeran Mohammedkutty et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Vijaya Bank, Tirur Branch vs Beeran Mohammedkutty et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Thu, 09/13/2007 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 07/18/2019 - 12:00
From
Mon, 07/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Pushpa.M.V. regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Shahul Hameed regarding money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Mahesh kumar.P.P. regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sabira et al regarding money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shihabudheen et al regarding money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Dismissed