Case Summary
Venugopal filed a complaint against Sooraj M. Ravindran under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant later filed a withdrawal petition which was allowed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the withdrawal petition filed by the complainant and acquitted the accused under Section 257 CrPC. The accused was set at liberty.
Key Reasoning:
The court allowed the withdrawal of the complaint.
The court allowed the withdrawal of the complaint.
Why Defendant Won:
The court allowed the withdrawal of the complaint.
The court allowed the withdrawal of the complaint.
Supporting Evidence
The court allowed the withdrawal of the complaint.
Judgment Evidence:
Complainant filed withdrawal petition. Allowed. Accused is acquitted under Section 257 CrPC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Venugopal
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sooraj M. Ravindran
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. Jeeraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- D. Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Withdrawal petition filed by the complainant was allowed.
Evidence:
Complainant filed withdrawal petition. Allowed.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused is acquitted under Section 257 CrPC.
Evidence:
Accused is acquitted under Section 257 CrPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2021
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act