Case Summary
M. S. Sebastian was the complainant against Binil Cheriyan for an offense under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant was absent during the proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused Binil Cheriyan was acquitted as the complainant was absent and did not present evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Complainant was absent and did not adduce evidence.
Complainant was absent and did not adduce evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Complainant was absent and did not adduce evidence.
Complainant was absent and did not adduce evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Complainant absent. No representation. Accused represented. Complainant is not ready to adduce evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence accused is acquitted under Section 256(1) CrPC. His bail bond is cancelled and he is set at liberty.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M. S. Sebastian
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Binil Cheriyan
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jaison Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Sanju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused is acquitted under Section 256(1) CrPC.
Evidence:
Complainant absent. No representation. Accused represented. Complainant is not ready to adduce evidence. Hence accused is acquitted under Section 256(1) CrPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2023
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act