Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.407/2019

Case between Venu vs Babu regarding lawsuit

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-08-05
Duration
Case Code No.
407
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Venu and Varghese against defendants Babu, Radha, and Arun. The plaintiff was absent during the trial, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence. This was pronounced in open court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence. This was pronounced in open court.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent during the trial.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent during the trial.
Supporting Evidence
The court stated that the plaintiff was absent during the trial, which led to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Since plaintiff absent, suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Venu
Party Age
75
Relation
S/o Kunjappan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Varghese
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o Antony
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Babu
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o. Kumaran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Radha
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o. Babu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arun
Party Age
22
Relation
S/o. Babu
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.G. Dileepkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.P. Udayabhanu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.K. Santhosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent, suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Ameena Makkar et al vs Aji et al regarding Suit dismissal for default
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Arrikar Foods Pvt. Ltd., et al vs M/s Swapna Traders, regarding recovery of dues for purchase of rice products
The Court of the Munsiff, Perumbavoor
Civil Plaintiff Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won