Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No.234/2023

Case between Vaikom Coir Vyavasaya Co-Opertive Society Ltd. vs Santhosh P.S. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-05-24
Duration
approximately-1 year 10 days
Case Closed
Sat, 05/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Vaikom Coir Vyavasaya Co-Opertive Society Ltd., filed a suit seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Santhosh P.S. and Ashokan. The defendants have allegedly trespassed and obstructed the peaceful enjoyment of the plaintiff's property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the plaintiff a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, restraining them from trespassing into the plaintiff's property. The plaintiff was also awarded costs from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted the plaintiff a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, restraining them from trespassing into the plaintiff's property. The plaintiff was also awarded costs from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established their ownership and the defendants' unauthorized interference with their property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established their ownership and the defendants' unauthorized interference with their property.
Supporting Evidence
From the unchallenged evidence, it can be seen that plaintiff is entitled to get a decree permanent prohibitory injunction as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows:- Defendants and men under them or their agents are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into item No.4 causing obstruction to the peaceful enjoyment of it and also to cause any obstruction to the transportation over item No.3, to do or cause to be done any damage over item No.4.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vaikom Coir Vyavasaya Co-Opertive Society Ltd.
Relation
represented by its Secretary Thushara
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhosh P.S.
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o Sreedharan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashokan
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o Sanku
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Minutes of plaintiff Society, True Copy of the letter authorising the Secretary on behalf of the plaintiff to conduct the case, Certified copy of Sale deed No.204/196 of Vaikom, Tax receipt issued by Kulasekharamangalam Village Officer.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.S.Renjith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Malu Johnson
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants and their agents are restrained from trespassing into item No.4 and obstructing transportation over item No.3.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows:- a.Defendants and men under them or their agents are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into item No.4 causing obstruction to the peaceful enjoyment of it and also to cause any obstruction to the transportation over item No.3.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to get costs from the defendants.
Evidence:
b.The plaintiff is entitled to get costs from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of Minutes of plaintiff Society
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the authorization of the Secretary to demarcate item No.4 by constructing a wall.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: True Copy of the letter authorising the Secretary
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing authorization of the Secretary to conduct the case on behalf of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document proving ownership of item No.3 and 4 property by the plaintiff society.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document issued by Kulasekharamangalam Village Officer to show proof of belonging to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Urgent Commission report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report that identified properties except item No.4.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch prepared by the commissioner in relation to the identified properties.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Right of way obstruction
Case Code
Case between Vaikom Coir Vyavasaya Co-Opertive Society Ltd. vs Santhosh P.S. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Vaikom Coir Vyavasaya Co-Opertive Society Ltd. vs Santhosh P.S. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Wed, 05/24/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 05/24/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Cooperative Society

Similar Cases

Case between Manoharan.R. vs Thampi regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mathanam Kochamgrackal Padasekhara Samithi vs Sathyan.K. et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vijayasree vs Thyagarajan regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.S Prabhakaran et al vs Sathiammal K.S et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Kanjirappally
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Raju George vs Kottayam Municipality et al regarding injunction and other incidental reliefs.
THE MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won