Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 213/2019

Case between V G Udayakumar et al vs M/s. Royal Castle Tiknar Apartment Owner's Welfare Association et al regarding Review Petition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-07-03
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a review petition filed by V G Udayakumar and others against M/s. Royal Castle Tiknar Apartment Owner's Welfare Association and others regarding an earlier order. The petition was heard on July 3, 2024.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The review petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The petition was dismissed based on it not being pressed.

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

V G Udayakumar (60 years years) Flat No. 4C, Royal Castle Tiknar Building, Doraiswamy lyer Road, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 035 Joy C G (69 years years) Flat No. 5D, Royal Castle Tiknar Building, Doraiswamy lyer Road, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 035 K Abdul Latheef (69 years years) Flat No. 3C, Royal Castle Tiknar Building, Doraiswarmy lyer Road, Ernakulam,Pin – 682 035 V Santharam (64 years years) Flat No. 4C, Royal Castle Tiknar Building, Doraiswamy lyer Road, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 035

Defendants

M/s. Royal Castle Tiknar Apartment Owner's Welfare Association (Age not specified years) Doraiswamy lyer Road, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 035 Babu Xavier (Age not specified years) Flat No 8 H & I, Royal Castle Tiknar Building, Doraiswamy lyer Road, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 035 Sindhu (Age not specified years) Flat No. 9 PH, Royal Castle Tiknar Building, Doraiswamy lyer Road, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 035

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The petition filed under Section 114 & Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases