Case Summary
This is a review petition filed under Section 114 read with Order 47 Rule 1 and Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure. The petitioners seek a review of the judgment and decree due to alleged errors in applying the correct law.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
The review petition seeking a review of the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No.1396/2005 has been dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
The Court found no error apparent on the face of record to review the judgment and decree.
The Court found no error apparent on the face of record to review the judgment and decree.
Why Defendant Won:
The Court found no error apparent on the face of record to review the judgment and decree.
The Court found no error apparent on the face of record to review the judgment and decree.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bhanumathy
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- W/o Govindan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajamma
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- W/o Madhavan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mani
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- W/o Ramadas
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mallika
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o Chandran
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pradeesh Chandran
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- S/o Chandran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Radhakrishnan
- Party Age
- 75
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nagendran
- Party Age
- 70
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ramagopal
- Party Age
- 68
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Santharam
- Party Age
- 65
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dhanapalan
- Party Age
- 63
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Review of Judgment and Decree
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
To correct the decretal portion by passing a composite decree
Evidence:
this Court has erred in not passing a composite decree as contemplated under the amended provisions of Order 34 Rule 4 of Court of Civil Procedure.
Relief Type:
Costs allocation
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Parties shall bear their respective costs
Evidence:
parties shall bear their respective costs.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Notification dated 20.11.1990
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Kerala High Court amendment to Civil Procedure Code
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Notification dated 1990
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Central amendment to Civil Procedure Code
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Review Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bhanumathy et al vs Radhakrishnan et al regarding review of judgment and decree passed in O.S. No.1396/2005
Case Code Year
Case between Bhanumathy et al vs Radhakrishnan et al regarding review of judgment and decree passed in O.S. No.1396/2005