Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Review Petition No.87/2024 in O.S. No.1396/2005

Case between Bhanumathy et al vs Radhakrishnan et al regarding review of judgment and decree passed in O.S. No.1396/2005

Court
MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany, II Additional Munsiff
Order Date
2025-01-06
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This is a review petition filed under Section 114 read with Order 47 Rule 1 and Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure. The petitioners seek a review of the judgment and decree due to alleged errors in applying the correct law.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The review petition seeking a review of the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No.1396/2005 has been dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The Court found no error apparent on the face of record to review the judgment and decree.

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Bhanumathy (70 years) Kizhakkedathu Madathum Muriyil, Eroor North P O, Tripunithura Rajamma (58 years) Kizhakkedathu Madathum Muriyil, Eroor North P O, Tripunithura Mani (56 years) Kizhakkedathu Madathum Muriyil, Eroor North P O, Tripunithura Mallika (52 years) Kizhakkedathu Madathum Muriyil, Eroor North P O, Tripunithura Pradeesh Chandran (29 years) Kizhakkedathu Madathum Muriyil, Eroor North P O, Tripunithura

Defendants

Radhakrishnan (75 years) Kalarikkal Parambil, Opposite Ayurveda College, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk Nagendran (70 years) Kalarikkal Parambil, Opposite Ayurveda College, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk Ramagopal (68 years) Kalarikkal Parambil, Opposite Ayurveda College, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk Santharam (65 years) Kalarikkal Parambil, Opposite Ayurveda College, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk Dhanapalan (63 years) Kalarikkal Parambil, Opposite Ayurveda College, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Review of Judgment and Decree
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
To correct the decretal portion by passing a composite decree
Evidence:
this Court has erred in not passing a composite decree as contemplated under the amended provisions of Order 34 Rule 4 of Court of Civil Procedure.
Relief Type: Costs allocation
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Parties shall bear their respective costs
Evidence:
parties shall bear their respective costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Notification dated 20.11.1990
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Kerala High Court amendment to Civil Procedure Code
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Notification dated 1990
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Central amendment to Civil Procedure Code
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases