Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. 761/2024

Case between Jayasankar Balakrishnan vs Manjusha M V regarding review of an order in I.A. 3/2024

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-03-20
Duration
approximately-4 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jayasankar Balakrishnan, the plaintiff, is seeking to review a court order that directed Manjusha M V to furnish security for a lesser amount than claimed. The plaintiff argues that the initial order is insufficient and seeks a modification to secure the full amount of Rs. 35,28,000/- as damages.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the review petition, finding no error in the original order. The parties were directed to bear their respective costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court found no error apparent on the face of the record regarding the original order.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, review petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jayasankar Balakrishnan (38 years) Shankers, Parapallil Lane, Hill Palace, Thiruvankulam P O, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 305

Defendants

Manjusha M V (45 years) Valiyaparambath House, Sanskrit College Road, Thripunithura P O, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 301

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Modification of the order directing the respondent to furnish security for Rs. 35,28,000/-
Evidence:
Therefore, this Court finds that there is no error apparent on the face of record to review the order in IA 3/2024.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases