Case Summary
Jayasankar Balakrishnan, the plaintiff, is seeking to review a court order that directed Manjusha M V to furnish security for a lesser amount than claimed. The plaintiff argues that the initial order is insufficient and seeks a modification to secure the full amount of Rs. 35,28,000/- as damages.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the review petition, finding no error in the original order. The parties were directed to bear their respective costs.
Key Reasoning:
The court found no error apparent on the face of the record regarding the original order.
The court found no error apparent on the face of the record regarding the original order.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found no error apparent on the face of the record regarding the original order.
The court found no error apparent on the face of the record regarding the original order.
Supporting Evidence
There is no error apparent on the face of record to the order passed by this Court.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, review petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jayasankar Balakrishnan
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manjusha M V
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Fixed deposit receipt from Union Bank, Tripunithura
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Basil Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ninan John
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sanjana Sara Varghese Annie
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A Balagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M N Manmadan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rajagopalan A
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Modification of the order directing the respondent to furnish security for Rs. 35,28,000/-
Evidence:
Therefore, this Court finds that there is no error apparent on the face of record to review the order in IA 3/2024.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Review Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2024