Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 239/2017

Case between Ursala vs Cherupushpam et al regarding declaration of joint right over property

Court
IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia. T.A
Order Date
2025-12-20
Duration
approximately-2 years 5 months
Case Code No.
239
Case Closed
Sat, 12/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a counter claim filed by Ursala against Cherupushpam and Mary Lourde regarding the declaration of a 1/7th right over a property. The court has assessed the claims and the evidence presented.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed a preliminary decree for partition of the property, declaring that Ursala has a 1/7th joint right over the property in question.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A preliminary decree for partition of the property.
Case Type
Counter Claim
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed a preliminary decree for partition of the property, declaring that Ursala has a 1/7th joint right over the property in question.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The counter-claim plaintiff proved her 1/7th joint right over the property as stated in the evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The counter-claim plaintiff proved her 1/7th joint right over the property as stated in the evidence.
Supporting Evidence
From Ext.A1, it is clear that the counter-claim plaintiff is not included in it or relinquished her right over the property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows: (i) It is hereby declared that the counter-claim plaintiff is having 1/7th joint right over the counter claim schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ursala
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o Ramadasan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cherupushpam
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o Omanakkuttan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mary Lourde
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o Divyan
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of sale deed No. 3256/1994 of Kundara SRO
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Haripriya.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jesla Kabir
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
It is hereby declared that the counter-claim plaintiff is having 1/7th joint right over the counter claim schedule property.
Evidence:
It is hereby declared that the counter-claim plaintiff is having 1/7th joint right over the counter claim schedule property.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The counter-claim schedule property shall be divided into 7 equal shares by metes and bounds partition.
Evidence:
The counter-claim schedule property shall be divided into 7 equal shares by metes and bounds partition.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The counter claim plaintiff is entitled to get 1/7 th share over the counter-claim schedule property.
Evidence:
The counter claim plaintiff is entitled to get 1/7 th share over the counter-claim schedule property.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
The court noted that equities, if any, will be considered at the final decree proceedings.
Evidence:
Equities, if any, will be considered at the final decree proceedings.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Counter claim plaintiff/1ˢᵗ defendant
Relevance:
This document proves the counter-claim plaintiff's joint right over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Counter Claim
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 12/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Piyoos vs Sheemol regarding setting aside the order in RP.No.259/2024
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Velukutty et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding Counter Claim
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Counter Claim Defendant Won
Case between SNDP Saka No.1068, Vattiyoorkavu et al vs Vilasini et al regarding Counter Claim
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Counter Claim Defendant Won
Case between Advaita Srikant vs Hilur M. Sainudeen regarding Counter Claim
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Counter Claim Defendant Won