Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 661/2023

Case between Union Bank of India vs Sunitha Sujith regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-12-11
Duration
approximately-0 years 0 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Union Bank of India as the plaintiff claiming that Sunitha Sujith, the defendant, has failed to repay a loan. The plaintiff seeks to recover an amount of ₹7,98,508.72 from the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant is directed to pay the claimed amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay ₹7,98,508.72 with interest at 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved based on uncontested evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 7,98,508.72/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Union Bank of India (Age not specified years) Building No. 32/1289, Peringattu Building, Palarivattom P.O, Kochi, Pin – 682 025, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Sunitha Sujith (not known to the plaintiff years) Nedumchilambil, Vennala, Pin – 682 028

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay the plaintiff an amount of 7,98,508.72/- with interest.
Evidence:
I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 7,98,508.72/- (Rupees seven lakhs ninety eight thousand five hundred and eight and seventy two paise only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document demonstrates the defendant's promise to repay the loan to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Letter of undertaking from the borrower
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter confirms the obligations undertaken by the borrower regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of Continuity
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter shows the ongoing commitment of the defendant to the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Interest Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement outlines the terms under which interest would be charged on the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Term loan agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement details the terms of the loan availed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Composite debit balance confirmation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the outstanding balance of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice serves as a formal communication regarding the outstanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This envelope indicates the delivery attempt of corresponding documents.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Computer printout of Statement of Account for the period from 26.04.2018 to 31.05.2021
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement provides a detailed account of transactions related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 12/05/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases