Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 811/2023

Case between Union Bank of India vs Sunitha Kalesan et al regarding Settlement of Suit

Court
I Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-11-26
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Union Bank of India filed a suit against multiple defendants regarding a matter that has been settled. The case was dismissed as not pressed after an endorsement by the plaintiff's counsel.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was settled between the parties involved, leading to the dismissal of the suit as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff and defendants reached a settlement.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Union Bank of India (Age not specified years) 239, Vidhan Bhawan Marg, Nariman point, Mumbai – 400 021

Defendants

Sunitha Kalesan (47 years) ARWA 59, Purakkerithundi, Dr. Ambedkar road, Vennala, Ernakulam – 682 028 Soumya Ramesh (39 years) Chettiyattu veettil, Dr.Ambedkar road, Vennala, Ernakulam – 682 028 Ramya P.K (36 years) 33/283-5, Padathuthundi house, Dr. Ambedkar road, Vennala, Ernakulam – 682 028 Mary K.M (60 years) Vettampilly, Dr. Ambedkar road, Vennala, Ernakulam – 682 028 Kanjana (59 years) Thittayil house, Dr. Ambedkar road, Vennala, Ernakulam – 682 028

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Counsel for the plaintiff made endorsement to that effect. Hence Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases