Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.218/2021

Case between Union Bank of India vs Smt. Radha Joshy regarding realization of money

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha.K.Bhadran
Order Date
2024-01-24
Duration
approximately-2 years 2 months 23 days
Case Code No.
218
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Union Bank of India as the plaintiff and Smt. Radha Joshy as the defendant. The plaintiff filed a petition to restore a suit that was dismissed for default due to non-representation on the part of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petitions filed by the plaintiff to restore the suit that was previously dismissed. The delay in filing the restoration petition was condoned.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petitions filed by the plaintiff to restore the suit that was previously dismissed. The delay in filing the restoration petition was condoned.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient grounds to allow the petitions based on the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found sufficient grounds to allow the petitions based on the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Supporting Evidence
The delay that occasioned is not willful. The court is satisfied that there is sufficient ground for allowing the above petitions in the interest of justice.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 1/2023 in RP 35/2022 is allowed. Delay of 79 days condoned. RP 35/2022 is allowed. Order dated 01.11.2021 dismissing the suit for default is set aside. Suit restored to file.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Union Bank of India
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt. Radha Joshy
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.S. Sajeevkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jyothilakshmi.A.N.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lakshmi.S.Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Delay of 79 days condoned.
Evidence:
IA 1/2023 in RP 35/2022 is allowed. Delay of 79 days condoned.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Order dated 01.11.2021 dismissing the suit for default is set aside.
Evidence:
RP 35/2022 is allowed. Order dated 01.11.2021 dismissing the suit for default is set aside.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit restored to file.
Evidence:
Suit restored to file.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 11/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Laly Rajan et al vs GIC Housing Finance Ltd. et al regarding mandatory injunction.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Pradeep K vs Nila Homes (P) Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between N.D. Premnath vs M/s. Jaihind Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Parka International, M/s Tag Retial Services vs Hannah Miriam Abraham regarding Suit for money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Radhakrishnan M U et al vs Santhosh Kumar P P regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won