Case Summary
The Union Bank of India, represented by its officer Anu Krishnan, filed a suit against Smt. Hayarunisa and three other defendants. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of both the plaintiff and the defendants.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as neither the plaintiff nor the defendants were present in the court during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Union Bank of India
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Smt. Hayarunisa
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Smt. Haseena
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Smt. Safiya
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Reetha
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Raghu Varma K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rajiv K S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India vs Smt. Hayarunisa et al regarding dismissal of the suit for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India vs Smt. Hayarunisa et al regarding dismissal of the suit for default.