Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.162/2024

Case between Union Bank of India vs Shihab Umbai, Shejeera Shihab regarding money realization

Court
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-04-09
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Union Bank of India is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants, Shihab Umbai and his wife Shejeera Shihab. The defendants defaulted on their loan, prompting the bank to file this suit for recovery.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount along with interest. The defendants are personally liable for the decree debt.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.1,61,115.06 with interest at the rate of 8.55% per annum and 2% penal interest
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount along with interest. The defendants are personally liable for the decree debt.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a case with unchallenged documents showing the defendants' default.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a case with unchallenged documents showing the defendants' default.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,61,115.06 with interest from defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendants shall pay Rs.1,61,115.06 along with interest @8.55% per annum and 2% penal interest from 02.02.2024 till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Union Bank of India
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shihab Umbai
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shejeera Shihab
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application No.4643/2018, Loan sanction letter, Hypothecation agreement, Demand promissory note, Letter of guarantee
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vino Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adarsh Dharmajan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants shall pay Rs.1,61,115.06 along with interest.
Evidence:
Defendants shall pay Rs.1,61,115.06 along with interest @8.55% per annum and 2% penal interest from 02.02.2024 till the date of decree and @6% from the date of decree till the date of payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants' personal liability for decree debt is established.
Evidence:
Defendants shall be personally and their assets shall also be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application Form Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that 1st defendant applied for loan of Rs.1,70,000 from plaintiff under Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana Scheme.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Is the loan sanction letter issued by plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Hypothecation of Vehicles agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by 1st defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: General term loan agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by 1st defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by 1st defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Letter of Continuity
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by 1st defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Letter of General Lien and Set Off
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by 1st defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Interest Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by 1st defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by 1st defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Letter of guarantee
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by 2nd defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Debit Balance confirmation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by 1st defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by the plaintiff bank to the defendants with postal receipts.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Maintained by the plaintiff bank relating to the defendants loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A13

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India vs Shihab Umbai, Shejeera Shihab regarding money realization
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India vs Shihab Umbai, Shejeera Shihab regarding money realization

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 09/28/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 04/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 04/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won