O.S. No.117/2023

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Neenu Solaman et al regarding court fee and representation.

Court

THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER

Judge

SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.

Order Date

2024-04-02

Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)

Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Union Bank of India filed a suit against Ms. Neenu Solaman and others. The case pertains to issues regarding court fees and representation of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case. Due to the absence and lack of necessary court fees, the plaint was rejected without costs.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of a balance court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, plaint is rejected. No costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Union Bank of India (Age not specified years) Palarivattom branch, 32/1289, Peringattu Building, Palarivattom, Kochi – 682 025

Defendants

Ms. Neenu Solaman (Age not specified years) Vellangattu House, Manjummel P.O, 683 501 T.Solaman (Age not specified years) Vellangattu House, Chettiparambu, Palarivattom – 682 025 Annie Solaman (Age not specified years) Vellangattu house, Vennala P.O, Palarivattom – 682 028

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

Plaint was rejected due to plaintiff's absence and lack of court fee.

Evidence:

Plaintiff absent, no representation. No balance court fee is seen filed. Hence, plaint is rejected.