Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.435/2023

Case between Union Bank of India vs Mr. Antony.N.V. regarding realization of money

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-01-11
Duration
approximately-5 years 5 days
Case Code No.
435
Case Closed
Thu, 01/11/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Union Bank of India filed a suit against Mr. Antony.N.V. for realization of a term loan amounting to Rs.4,75,148.06. The defendant defaulted on repayment, prompting the bank to seek legal judgment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the overdue loan amount along with interest. The defendant's assets are also liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay Rs.4,75,148.06 with interest and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the overdue loan amount along with interest. The defendant's assets are also liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a case with unchallenged evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a case with unchallenged evidence.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,75,148.06 with interest from defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendant shall pay Rs.4,75,148.06 with interest @11.30% per annum from 13.04.2023 till the date of decree and @ 6% from the date of decree till the date of payment or realization, as the case may be, to plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Union Bank of India
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Antony.N.V.
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application, Sanction Terms and conditions, Demand Promissory Note, Letter of continuity, Term Loan Agreement, Interest Agreement, Letter of undertaking from borrower, Debit Balance Confirmation, Copy of Notice, Recall Notice, Advocate Notice, Statement of account with certificate under banker’s books of evidence act.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. S. Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought the recovery of an outstanding amount of Rs.4,75,148.06 with interest.
Evidence:
Plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,75,148.06 with interest from defendant.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought interest on the recovered amount.
Evidence:
Defendant shall pay interest at the rate of 11.30% along with interest per annum from 13.04.2023 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document detailing the loan application made by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction Terms and Conditions
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document containing the terms and conditions for the loan sanctioned to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document through which the defendant promised to pay back the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of Continuity
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document confirming the continuity of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Term loan agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document outlining the terms of the term loan taken by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Interest Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document detailing the interest agreement related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Letter of Undertaking from Borrower
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document wherein the borrower undertakes to comply with the terms of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Debit Balance confirmation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document confirming the outstanding debit balance of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Copy of notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document representing formal notices issued to the defendant regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Copy of notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Duplicate notice issued to the defendant regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Copy of Recall Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice calling upon the defendant to repay the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Copy of Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice issued to the defendant regarding repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document acknowledging receipt of communications by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document summarizing the financial transactions and outstanding amounts.
Reference:
Ext.A14

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 12/28/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 01/11/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s. Eeza Trade Impex, Joseph.P.M. regarding realization of money
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Naveenchandran.O. et al regarding realization of money
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s. Care Diaganostics regarding realization of money.
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Punjab National Bank vs Nimesh.V.V. et al regarding realization of money.
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won