Case Summary
The case involves Union Bank of India as the plaintiff and Mohabath NHG along with several defendants. The plaintiff did not represent itself at the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to represent its case in court.
The plaintiff failed to represent its case in court.
Judgment Evidence:
This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 20.06.2025 and the court on the same day delivered the following: Plaintiff no representation. Not press memo filed. Dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Union Bank of India (Age not specified years)
239, Vidhan Bhavan Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai, Regional Office at Union Bank Bhavan, M.G.Road. Ernakulam; and having one of its Branch at Thrikkakkara, Olimughal Junction, Kakkanad, Ernakulam – 682 030
Defendants
Mohabath NHG-73 (Age not specified years)
Division - 14, West CDS, Cochin Corporation, Palluruthy, Ernakulam 682 006
Mrs. Nishitha Sudheer (32 years)
Vadakkeveettil Parambu House, 832A/20, MLA Road, Palluruthy, Ernakulam – 682 006
Mrs. Shaharban.P.B (25 years)
23/920A, Koittakkal, SN Lane, Palluruthy.P.O, Ernakulam – 682 006
Mrs. Fathima Haneef (64 years)
Puthuveettil Parambu House, Chullikkal, Mattanchery Town, Mattanchery.P.O, Ernakulam – 682 002
Mrs. Thasni (36 years)
Kezhakke Cheruppedath House, Arookutty, Vaduthalajetty, Cherthala, Alappuzha – 688 535
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Plaintiff no representation. Not press memo filed. Dismissed as not pressed.