Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 684/2024

Case between Union Bank of India vs Deepa Hariharan et al regarding mediation agreement.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-11-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Union Bank of India filed a suit against Deepa Hariharan and others. The matter was settled through mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The case was settled in mediation. The terms of the mediation agreement were found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee as per rules in view of the amicable settlement in mediation.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was settled in mediation. The terms of the mediation agreement were found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mediation agreement was lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The mediation agreement was lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of the compromise agreement forming part of the Mediation Report found lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement. Mediation agreement shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Union Bank of India
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Renju Ranjan
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deepa Hariharan
Party Age
31
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.B.Hariharan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mini Hariharan
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vino Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Akash Shaji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sajan Varghese M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Gopee Krishnan K.J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Mediation agreement shall form part of the decree.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India vs Deepa Hariharan et al regarding mediation agreement.
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India vs Deepa Hariharan et al regarding mediation agreement.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won