Case Summary
The plaintiff, Union Bank of India, filed a suit against the defendants including Alexander Papali J and others. The case was dismissed as not pressed, indicating that the parties reached a settlement.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and there was no representation, leading to the dismissal of the suit as not pressed. All interim orders were vacated and no costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Union Bank of India
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Alexander Papali J
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sherine
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Merlin Fernandez
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S Krishnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed due to satisfaction that matter settled between parties.
Evidence:
Hence satisfied that matter settled between parties. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India vs Alexander Papali J et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India vs Alexander Papali J et al regarding dismissal of suit