Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 971/2023

Case between Union Bank of India vs Alexander Papali J et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-05-26
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Union Bank of India, filed a suit against the defendants including Alexander Papali J and others. The case was dismissed as not pressed, indicating that the parties reached a settlement.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent and there was no representation, leading to the dismissal of the suit as not pressed. All interim orders were vacated and no costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Union Bank of India (Age not specified years) 239, Vidhan Bhavan Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai and Regional Office at Union Bank Bhavan, M G Road, Ernakulam

Defendants

Alexander Papali J (31 years) Valiyaparambil, BTS Road, Edappally- 682024 Sherine (52 years) TC 6/144/2, GRA/D/298, Guruji Nagar, Kuruvikkad, Vattiyoorkkavu, Thiruvananthapuram- 695013 Merlin Fernandez (Age not specified years) Mullavely, Kalamassery, Ernakulam- 683104

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed due to satisfaction that matter settled between parties.
Evidence:
Hence satisfied that matter settled between parties. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases