Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 121 OF 2018

Case between Ummer vs Kunhimuhammed @ Kunhava regarding declaration and injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-07-16
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Ummer, is seeking a declaration of his right to use a way leading to his property, which the defendants are obstructing by constructing a well. The defendants did not appear in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in part, allowing the plaintiff to use the way and restraining the defendants from obstructing him. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed in part as follows: It is declared that the plaintiff is entitled to use the way marked as 'W' in Ext. C4 plan, dated 01.08.2018. The defendants are restrained by way of perpetual prohibitory injunction, from obstructing the plaintiff from using the said way.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Ummer (55 years) Perincheri House, Thruprangode amsom & Post Kainikara desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Kunhimuhammed @ Kunhava (39 years) Naseema (35 years) Mannooparambil House, Thruprangode amsom & Post Kainikara desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
It is declared that the plaintiff is entitled to use the way marked as 'W' in Ext. C4 plan.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed in part as follows:- 1.It is declared that the plaintiff is entitled to use the way marked as 'W' in Ext. C4 plan, dated 01.08.2018.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are restrained by way of perpetual prohibitory injunction from obstructing the plaintiff from using the said way.
Evidence:
2.The defendants are restrained by way of perpetual prohibitory injunction, from obstructing the plaintiff from using the said way.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
3.Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the plaintiff's ownership of the plaint 'A' schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
These reports and plans provide evidence regarding the property and the way used by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.C1 to C4

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases