Case Summary
Ummer Bin Kassim and Abdul Azeez Bin Kassim filed a rent control petition against Parammal Kunhimuhammed. The court dismissed the petition for default as the petitioners were absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petitioners were reported absent, leading to the dismissal of their petition for default.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ummer Bin Kassim
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Azeez Bin Kassim
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Parammal Kunhimuhammed
- Party Age
- 52
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dinesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Sreehari.P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Petition dismissed for default due to absence of petitioners.
Evidence:
Petition dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ummer Bin Kassim et al vs Parammal Kunhimuhammed regarding rent control
Case Code Year
Case between Ummer Bin Kassim et al vs Parammal Kunhimuhammed regarding rent control