Rent Control Petition No. 14 of 2017

Case between Ummer Bin Kasim et al vs Parammal Kunhimuhammed et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Court

The Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur

Judge

Sri. Jankish Narayanan

Order Date

2019-08-08

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Ummer Bin Kasim and Abdul Azeez Bin Kasim, filed a rent control petition against the respondents, including Parammal Kunhimuhammed and others. The petition was dismissed as the petitioners were absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioners in court. The petitioners were reported to have no instruction.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioners in court. The petitioners were reported to have no instruction.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

the petition was dismissed with cost.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Ummer Bin Kasim
Party Age: 46
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Abdul Azeez Bin Kasim
Party Age: 43
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Parammal Kunhimuhammed
Party Age: 52

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Parammal Badaru
Party Age: 46
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Parammal Abbas
Party Age: 44
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Parammal Hamza
Party Age: 48
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Parammal Kunhippa
Party Age: 42
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Dinesh Pookkayil
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.Sreehari.P.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Petition dismissed with cost due to petitioner's absence.

Evidence:

Counsel for petitioner reported no instruction. Petitioner's name called absent. Petition dismissed with cost.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification