Rent Control Petition No. 14 of 2017

Case between Ummer Bin Kasim et al vs Parammal Kunhimuhammed et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Court

The Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur

Judge

Sri. Jankish Narayanan

Order Date

2019-08-08

Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)

Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Ummer Bin Kasim and Abdul Azeez Bin Kasim, filed a rent control petition against the respondents, including Parammal Kunhimuhammed and others. The petition was dismissed as the petitioners were absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioners in court. The petitioners were reported to have no instruction.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

the petition was dismissed with cost.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Ummer Bin Kasim (46 years) Valiyapeediyekkal Veedu, Vettom Amsom Padiyam desom, Tirur Taluk. Koottayi.P.O. PIN 676 562 Abdul Azeez Bin Kasim (43 years) Valiyapeediyekkal Veedu, Vettom Amsom Padiyam desom, Tirur Taluk. Koottayi.P.O. PIN 676 562

Defendants

Parammal Kunhimuhammed (52 years) Near Railway Station, Thrikkandiyur amsom desom, Tirur Taluk. Parammal Badaru (46 years) Thrikkandiyur amsom desom, Tirur Taluk. Parammal Abbas (44 years) Thrikkandiyur amsom desom, Tirur Taluk. Parammal Hamza (48 years) Thrikkandiyur amsom desom, Tirur Taluk. Parammal Kunhippa (42 years) Thrikkandiyur amsom desom, Tirur Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Petition dismissed with cost due to petitioner's absence.

Evidence:

Counsel for petitioner reported no instruction. Petitioner's name called absent. Petition dismissed with cost.