Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 217/2025

Case between Udayakumar T. K. vs Mathai K. G. regarding temporary prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-09-23
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Udayakumar T. K. and Saira Udayan are seeking a temporary prohibitory injunction against Mathai K. G. and Varghesekutty K. M. regarding the demolition of a wall situated at the eastern side of the plaint B schedule property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the petitioners established a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience lies in favor of the petitioners. The court granted a temporary injunction against the defendants from demolishing the wall.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary prohibitory injunction against the demolition of the wall.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established a prima facie case and the balance of convenience was in their favor.

Judgment Evidence:

Accordingly, until further orders, the respondents and any person under them are hereby temporarily restrained from demolishing any portion of the wall (kayyala) situated at the eastern side of the plaint B schedule property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Udayakumar T. K. (64 years years) Thaiparambil House, Mudakuzha P O, Vengoor West Village, Kunnathunad Taluk, Ernakulam, Pin 683 546 Saira Udayan (56 years years) Thaiparambil House, Mudakuzha PO, Vengoor West Village, Kunnathunad Taluk, Ernakulam, Pin-683546

Defendants

Mathai K. G. (75 years years) House No.34 Starline, Kuruppampady P O, Kudu, Ernakulam, Pin – 683546 Varghesekutty K. M. (60 years years) Kallerakkal House, Puthupadi P O, Muvattupuzha, Pin- 683673

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Seeking a temporary prohibitory injunction to restrain the respondents from demolishing any portion of the wall situated at the eastern side of the plaint B schedule property.
Evidence:
Accordingly, until further orders, the respondents and any person under them are hereby temporarily restrained from demolishing any portion of the wall (kayyala) situated at the eastern side of the plaint B schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases