Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 43/2025

Case between UCO Bank vs M/s Nihas Collections regarding money realization

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-06-13
Duration
approximately-2 years 11 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, UCO Bank, filed a suit against the defendants, M/s Nihas Collections and its proprietor Rinu Kunjumon, for non-repayment of a cash credit and term loan totaling Rs. 7,00,351.02. Defendants failed to appear in court and were set exparte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay Rs. 7,00,351.02 along with interest. The defendants' assets are also liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants shall pay Rs.7,00,351.02/- along with 10.50% interest from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay Rs. 7,00,351.02 along with interest. The defendants' assets are also liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff established a case for the recovery of the loan amount through presented evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff established a case for the recovery of the loan amount through presented evidence.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendants shall pay Rs.7,00,351.02/- along with 10.50% interest from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
UCO Bank
Relation
represented by its Branch Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Nihas Collections
Relation
represented by its sole proprietor
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rinu Kunjumon
Relation
W/o Nidheesh KL
Plaintiffs Documents
Sanction letter, Composite deed of hypothecation, Term loan agreement, Demand promissory notes, Demand notices, Statement of accounts, Calculation statements.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G G Manoj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S Sarath Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants shall pay Rs.7,00,351.02/- along with interest.
Evidence:
Defendants are directed to pay interest @10.50% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization or payment and 6% from the date of decree till the date of payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants and their assets shall be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Evidence:
Defendants shall be personally and their assets shall also be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the terms and conditions are duly signed and accepted by the defendants on 28.07.2022.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Composite Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement relating to Term Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Duly executed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed in favour of the plaintiff bank against the term loan facility sanctioned.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the defendants executed a demand promissory note for Rs.1,00,000.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Demand Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued to the defendants regarding the loan defaults.
Reference:
Exts.A6 and A7
Document Type: Statement of Account under Cash Credit Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Duly certified statement showing amounts due.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Calculation Statement of Interest
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the interest accrued but not applied in the account.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Statement of Account under Term Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Duly certified statement showing amounts due.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Calculation Statement of Interest
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the interest accrued but not applied in the account.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between UCO Bank vs M/s Nihas Collections regarding money realization
Case Code Year
Case between UCO Bank vs M/s Nihas Collections regarding money realization

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 07/28/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won