Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 314/2025

Case between UCO Bank vs M/s Las Vegas Fitness Center et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-08-25
Duration
approximately-1 year 9 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

UCO Bank filed a suit against M/s Las Vegas Fitness Center and Mathew Joseph for recovery of money owed under two loan agreements. The defendants defaulted on repayments, leading to the bank seeking legal recourse to recover the amounts due.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, UCO Bank, allowing them to recover the amounts owed by the defendants due to their defaults. The defendants were found liable for the outstanding loans and interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.8,13,195.13/- from the defendants and their assets.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, UCO Bank, allowing them to recover the amounts owed by the defendants due to their defaults. The defendants were found liable for the outstanding loans and interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved their claim based on the executed loan agreements and the default in repayment by the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully proved their claim based on the executed loan agreements and the default in repayment by the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A18 established the case as pleaded by plaintiff. It was found that the defendants owe the plaint claim to the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is decreed as follows; The plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.8,13,195.13/- (Rupees Eight Lakh Thirteen Thousand One Hundred and Ninety Five and Thirteen Paise only) from the defendants and from their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
UCO Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Las Vegas Fitness Center
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mathew Joseph
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan sanction letter, original agreement relating to term loan, original guarantee agreement, original composite deed of Hypothecation, original promissory note.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G.G.Manoj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Sarathprasad
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Madavikutty
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the sum owed from the defendants.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.8,13,195.13/- (Rupees Eight Lakh Thirteen Thousand One Hundred and Ninety Five and Thirteen Paise only) from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover interest from the defendants.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 10.85 % per annum for the plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.8,13,195.13/- (Rupees Eight Lakh Thirteen Thousand One Hundred and Ninety Five and Thirteen Paise only) from the date of suit till date decree from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover interest at a different rate post-decree.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for the plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.8,13,195.13/- (Rupees Eight Lakh Thirteen Thousand One Hundred and Ninety Five and Thirteen Paise only) from date of decree till date of realization from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs incurred in the suit.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the original loan sanctioned to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Term loan agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the terms of the term loan agreed upon by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the personal guarantee provided by the guarantor.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Composite Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document secures the loan against the defendants' assets.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is an additional security for the term loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the defendants' promise to repay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Letter of Sanction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document approves an additional working capital term loan to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Composite Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is another hypothecation securing the additional loan.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Term loan agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms of the additional loan taken by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as a promise to repay the amount of the new loan.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document covers the guarantee for the additional loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Revival Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the revival of the loan agreement by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Revival Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter further revives the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Revival Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter continues the acknowledgment of their debt.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides a detailed account record of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Calculation Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document contains calculations related to the loan amounts.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is another account statement for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A17
Document Type: Calculation Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is another calculation statement pertaining to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A18

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between UCO Bank vs M/s Las Vegas Fitness Center et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between UCO Bank vs M/s Las Vegas Fitness Center et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 08/25/2025 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won