Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 228/2025

Case between UCO Bank vs M/s Ayrin Aquatics et al regarding recovery of loan amount.

Court
THE MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-10-24
Duration
approximately-2 years 9 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, UCO Bank, is seeking recovery of a loan amount from the defendants, M/s Ayrin Aquatics and its proprietor Ali Akbar C.B. The defendants defaulted on their repayment obligations despite accepting the loan terms.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendants to pay a total of ₹4,82,413.85 with interest. The defendants did not appear in court to contest the claims.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants are directed to pay ₹4,82,413.85 with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The proof affidavit and documents submitted by the plaintiff adequately proved the claim of the bank.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of ₹4,82,413.85...

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

UCO Bank (Age not specified years) Midland Arcade, Chilavannoor road, Vyttila, Kadavanthra, Ernkulam, Pin – 682 020

Defendants

M/s Ayrin Aquatics (Age not specified years) 3/14, Thamarapalli, building, N.M.Junction, Kumpbalam, Ernakulam, Kerala, pin – 682 506 Ali Akbar C.B (28 years) Cheruthodath house, Cheppanam, Panangad P.O, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 506

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is granted recovery of the sum due from the defendants.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of ₹4,82,413.85 with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to demonstrate the loan agreement between the plaintiff and the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Composite Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided security for the loan and outlined the terms of repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement relating to Term Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the terms of the loan repayment schedule.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as an acknowledgment of the debt to be repaid to the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the personal guarantee of the second defendant for the loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the due amount and transaction history relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Calculation Statement of Interest
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the interest that has accrued but not yet been applied to the account.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/31/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases