Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 227/2025

Case between UCO Bank vs Ali Akbar C. B regarding realisation of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-09-08
Duration
approximately-3 years 2 months 12 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

UCO Bank filed a suit against Ali Akbar C. B for the recovery of a loan amount after the defendant failed to repay. The court found in favor of the bank based on uncontested evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of UCO Bank, ordering the defendant to pay a total of ₹4,91,094.44 with interest at 6% per annum. The court provided terms for payment and entitlement to costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Amount of ₹4,91,094.44 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved based on uncontested evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 4,91,094.44/- (Rupees four lakhs ninety one thousand ninety four and forty four paise only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

UCO Bank (Age not specified years) Midland Arcade, Chilavannoor Road, Vyttila, Kadavanthra, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 020

Defendants

Ali Akbar C. B (28 years years) Cheruthodath House, Cheppanam, Panangad P.O, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 506

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount of ₹4,91,094.44 from the defendant.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the same from the defendant, with interest from the date of suit.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the loan agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement relating to Term Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to outline the terms of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Composite Deed of Hypothication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to secure the loan against the hypothecation of assets.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to formally demand the repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Customer account ledger report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provided evidence of the transactions related to the loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Calculation Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document detailed the calculations of the amount owed, including interest.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Mon, 06/27/2022 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases