Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 227/2025

Case between UCO Bank vs Ali Akbar C. B regarding realisation of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-09-08
Duration
approximately-3 years 2 months 12 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

UCO Bank filed a suit against Ali Akbar C. B for the recovery of a loan amount after the defendant failed to repay. The court found in favor of the bank based on uncontested evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of UCO Bank, ordering the defendant to pay a total of ₹4,91,094.44 with interest at 6% per annum. The court provided terms for payment and entitlement to costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Amount of ₹4,91,094.44 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of UCO Bank, ordering the defendant to pay a total of ₹4,91,094.44 with interest at 6% per annum. The court provided terms for payment and entitlement to costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved based on uncontested evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved based on uncontested evidence.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 4,91,094.44/- (Rupees four lakhs ninety one thousand ninety four and forty four paise only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
UCO Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ali Akbar C. B
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Sanction Letter, Agreement relating to term loan, Composite Deed of Hypothication, Demand Promissory Note, Customer account ledger report, Copy of Calculation Statement
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G. G Manoj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Sarath Prasad
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Madhavikutty
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Selvi Bridgit P. F
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anish Jain
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount of ₹4,91,094.44 from the defendant.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the same from the defendant, with interest from the date of suit.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the loan agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement relating to Term Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to outline the terms of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Composite Deed of Hypothication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to secure the loan against the hypothecation of assets.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to formally demand the repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Customer account ledger report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provided evidence of the transactions related to the loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Calculation Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document detailed the calculations of the amount owed, including interest.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between UCO Bank vs Ali Akbar C. B regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between UCO Bank vs Ali Akbar C. B regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 06/27/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won