Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 285/2025

Case between UCO Bank et al vs Sana Enterprises et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-11
Duration
Case Closed
Fri, 07/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves UCO Bank seeking recovery of a loan amount from Sana Enterprises and its proprietor Sajeena Sujith. The defendants failed to repay the loan, which led to the bank filing the suit for realization.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, decreeing that the defendants owe the bank a sum of Rs.4,37,414.45 along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.4,37,414.45 along with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, decreeing that the defendants owe the bank a sum of Rs.4,37,414.45 along with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unrebutted oral testimony and documents established the plaintiff's claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unrebutted oral testimony and documents established the plaintiff's claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A10 established the case as pleaded by plaintiff. It was found that the defendants owe the plaint claim to the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows; The plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.4,37,414.45/- from the defendants and from their assets. The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 10.50 % per annum for Rs.4,37,414.45/- from the date of suit till date decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
UCO Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sana Enterprises
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajeena Sujith
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan application dated 04.02.2021, Original loan sanction letter dated 06.03.2021, Original composite deed of hypothecation dated 06.03.2021, Original demand promissory Note dated 06.03.2021, Original letter of Waiver of Presentment dated 06.03.2021, Letter of Continuity dated 06.03.2021, Acknowledgment of Debts and Securities dated 31.03.2023, Statement of accounts certified as per the Bankers Books Evidence Act, Recall notice dated 23.08.2024, Postal cover returned.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepak Joy K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.4,37,414.45/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows; 1. The plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.4,37,414.45/- from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 10.50 % per annum from the date of suit till date decree.
Evidence:
2. The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 10.50 % per annum for Rs.4,37,414.45/- from the date of suit till date decree from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum from date of decree till date of realization.
Evidence:
3. The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.4,37,414.45/- from date of decree till date of realization from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants.
Evidence:
4. The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original loan application dated 04.02.2021.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original loan sanction letter dated 06.03.2021.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Composite Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original composite deed of hypothecation dated 06.03.2021.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original demand promissory note dated 06.03.2021.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter of Waiver of Presentment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original letter of waiver of presentment dated 06.03.2021.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Letter of Continuity
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter of continuity dated 06.03.2021.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debts and Securities
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of debts and securities dated 31.03.2023.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of accounts duly certified as per the Bankers Books Evidence Act.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Recall Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Recall notice dated 23.08.2024.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Postal Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal cover returned.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Unrebutted oral testimony of PW1.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between UCO Bank et al vs Sana Enterprises et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between UCO Bank et al vs Sana Enterprises et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 02/04/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 07/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won