Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1299 /2016

Case between T.Selvaraj et al vs M.K.Ayyappan et al regarding review of order rejecting plaint.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishan M
Order Date
2025-09-12
Duration
approximately-9 years 2 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, T.Selvaraj and Sreekala Unni, filed a review petition against the defendants M.K.Ayyappan and Lalu, seeking to set aside a prior order that rejected their suit for non-payment of court fees. They claimed the original order was passed without giving them a chance to be heard, impacting their rights.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the review petition filed by the plaintiffs, stating that there was no error apparent on the face of the record to warrant a review of the prior order. The plaintiffs were repeatedly given opportunities to comply with court fee requirements but failed to do so.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The rejection of the plaint was based on the plaintiffs' failure to comply with statutory requirements regarding court fees.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

T.Selvaraj (33 years) Thachonamnikathil, Edappally north, Kunnumpuram P.O, Cochin – 682 024 Sreekala Unni (32 years) Thengathara house, Kochi Taluk, Njarakkal P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 505

Defendants

M.K.Ayyappan (70 years) Punnakkattu house, Pallilamkaa, Thrikkakara village, Kanayannur taluk, Kalamassery P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin – 683 203 Lalu (39 years) Punnakkattu house, Pallilamkara, Thrikkakara village, Kanayannur taluk, Kalamassery P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin – 683 503

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiffs sought review of the order dated 27/06/2024 and restoration of the suit.
Evidence:
This court finds no reason to review the order dated 27.06.2024. The petition is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiffs sought to set aside the fabricated registered Settlement Deed No. 3687/D/2014.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiffs sought to set aside the registered Gift Deed No. 471/1979.
Reference:
null

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases