Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 545/2019

Case between Thomas.L vs Jacob.P regarding restoration of petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-11-28
Duration
approximately-2 years 11 months 10 days
Case Code No.
545
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Thomas.L, the petitioner and plaintiff, who sought to restore a previous petition that was dismissed due to failure to take necessary steps. Jacob.P, the respondent and defendant, opposed this restoration citing negligence on the part of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the applications for condonation of delay and restoration of the petition. The judge found the explanation for the delay to be insufficient.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the applications for condonation of delay and restoration of the petition. The judge found the explanation for the delay to be insufficient.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to explain the delay in filing the restoration petition, which was deemed to be an attempt to prolong the proceedings.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The delay of 155 days not at all explained. The delay thus remains unexplained and appears to be an attempt to protract the proceedings.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 01/2025 and RP 41/2025 are dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thomas.L
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jacob.P
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G.Haridas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Paul Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Condonation of delay in filing RP 41/2025
Evidence:
The delay thus remains unexplained and appears to be an attempt to protract the proceedings. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay is devoid of merit.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Restoration of RP 213/2023
Evidence:
In view of my finding on Point No.1, this point does not germane for consideration.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Satheesh et al vs Ajayan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Babu Chandhar et al vs Sarada Chandhatty et al regarding Partition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Parukutti Amma et al vs Abdul Rahim regarding restoration of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Piyoos vs Sheemol regarding setting aside the order in RP.No.259/2024
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won