Case Summary
The case involves a restoration petition filed by Thomas against Kunjappan and others. The petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The restoration petition filed was dismissed by the court as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was not pursued, leading to its dismissal.
The petition was not pursued, leading to its dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was not pursued, leading to its dismissal.
The petition was not pursued, leading to its dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The petition was not pursued, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Evidence:
RP closed. Dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thomas
- Party Age
- 60
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunjappan
- Party Age
- 75
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sosamma
- Relation
- W/o Kunjappan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mary Thomas
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- W/o Thomas
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jeevan
- Relation
- S/o Thomas
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Emili
- Relation
- D/o Thomas
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.J.Kuriakose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
RP closed. Dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thomas vs Kunjappan et al regarding Restoration Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Thomas vs Kunjappan et al regarding Restoration Petition