Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 149/2024

Case between Thomas P.C et al vs Metropolitan Arch Bishop et al regarding setting aside ex-parte order.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-12-18
Duration
Case Code No.
149
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the defendants seeking to set aside an ex-parte order issued against them. The plaintiffs opposed this request during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The application by the defendants to set aside the ex-parte order was allowed, provided they pay costs to the plaintiffs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Ex-parte order set aside upon payment of costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The application by the defendants to set aside the ex-parte order was allowed, provided they pay costs to the plaintiffs.
Key Reasoning:
Procedural rules are intended to advance justice, and the defendants should be afforded an opportunity to contest the matter.
Why Defendant Won:
Procedural rules are intended to advance justice, and the defendants should be afforded an opportunity to contest the matter.
Supporting Evidence
It is settled that procedural rules are intended to advance justice and that parties should ordinarily be afforded an opportunity to contest the matter on merits.

Judgment Evidence:

IA No. 5 of 2025 is allowed, subject to payment of costs of 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) by defendants 1 and 2 to the plaintiffs within seven days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thomas P.C
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
George Joseph
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Metropolitan Arch Bishop
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mar Mathew Moolakkattu
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Agi Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anish Lukose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
IA No. 5 of 2025 is allowed, subject to payment of costs of 1,000/- by defendants 1 and 2 to the plaintiffs within seven days from today.
Evidence:
In the result, (I)IA No. 5 of 2025 is allowed, subject to payment of costs of 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) by ₹ defendants 1 and 2 to the plaintiffs within seven days from today.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
On payment of costs, the ex-parte order dated 18-08-2025 shall stand set aside.
Evidence:
(ii)On payment of costs, the ex-parte order dated 18-08-2025 shall stand set aside.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The written statement filed by the defendants at the time of hearing shall be received on file.
Evidence:
(iii)The written statement filed by the defendants at the time of hearing shall be received on file.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
In default of payment of costs within the time stipulated, this application shall stand dismissed automatically, without further orders.
Evidence:
(iv)In default of payment of costs within the time stipulated, this application shall stand dismissed automatically, without further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam District
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Akhil Geevarghese Jose vs Soniya Mariyam Varghese et al regarding suit dismissal.
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Mathew and Sons Finance vs Siby Jacob @ Sibi et al regarding suit for decree in terms of compromise
Munsiff's Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Mathew and Sons Finance vs Thomas.J.S et al regarding compromise petition.
THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Shajimon Mathew vs Ayyappan et al regarding compromise petition
MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Omana Markose vs P.O Devarsykutty, Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited regarding temporary injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won