Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Thomas Binu and Laiju Lawrance, are involved in a suit against the defendant, Bindu Johnson. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were not present.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs were not present and not ready for evidence.
Plaintiffs were not present and not ready for evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs were not present and not ready for evidence.
Plaintiffs were not present and not ready for evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiffs were not present and not ready for evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thomas Binu
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Laiju Lawrance
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bindu Johnson
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- George Renoy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Emmanuel Tony P.T.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.K. Shaji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thomas Binu et al vs Bindu Johnson regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Thomas Binu et al vs Bindu Johnson regarding dismissal for default.