Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
Rent Control Petition No. 30 of 2016

Case between Thitheemu et al vs Sunitha regarding rent control petition

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2016-12-21
Duration
Not mentioned

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners filed a rent control petition under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, which was later dismissed as not pressed as per petitioner's counsel submission.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The rent control petition filed by the petitioners was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed as not pressed
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

He made endorsement to that effect. Hence, petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Thitheemu (60 years) Pallippat Thoomban House, Cheriyamundam Amsom, Desom and Post, Tirur Taluk Fathima Rooby (32 years) Pallippat Thoomban House, Cheriyamundam Amsom, Desom and Post, Tirur Taluk Muhammed Anwar (44 years) Pallippat Thoomban House, Cheriyamundam Amsom, Petitioners Desom and Post, Tirur Taluk Muhammed Ashraf (46 years) Pallippat Thoomban House, Cheriyamundam Amsom, Petitioners Desom and Post, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Sunitha (44 years) Kuttiyattil House, Kattipparuthy Amsom, Desom & Post, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Dismissal
Outcome: Dismissed as not pressed
Description:
Rent control petition dismissed as not pressed
Evidence:
He made endorsement to that effect. Hence, petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 12/21/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases