Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.16 OF 2016

Case between Thitheemu et al vs P. Rajeev Kumar regarding rent control petition

Court
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-01-03
Duration
Less than a year

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Four petitioners filed a petition under section 5(1) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965. The counsel for the petitioners did not press the application, resulting in the dismissal of the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed as not pressed by the counsel for the petitioners.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Not mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

The counsel for the petitioner not pressed the application. Hence the petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Thitheemu (60 years) Pallippatt Thoomban House, Cheriyamundam amsom, desom, & Post, Tirur Taluk Fathima Ruby (32 years) Pallippatt Thoomban House, Cheriyamundam amsom, desom, & Post, Tirur Taluk Muhammed Anwar (44 years) Pallippatt Thoomban House, Cheriyamundam amsom, desom, & Post, Tirur Taluk Muhammed Ashraf (46 years) Pallippatt Thoomban House, Cheriyamundam amsom, desom, & Post, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

P. Rajeev Kumar (Age not specified years) Perathara House, Thalakkad amsom, Mangattiri desom and Post, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Not Decided
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Not mentioned
Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases