Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 9 OF 2016

Case between Thitheemu et al vs K. Mohandas regarding tenancy dispute

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2016-12-21
Duration
Not mentioned
Case Closed
Wed, 12/21/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Tenancy dispute between four petitioners seeking to enforce rights under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act was dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition filed by the petitioners under Section 11(3) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissing the petition as not pressed
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by the petitioners under Section 11(3) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thitheemu
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o Late Kunhimuhammed
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Fathima Rooby
Party Age
32
Relation
D/o Late Kunhimuhammed
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Anwar
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o Late Kunhimuhammed
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Ashraf
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o Late Kunhimuhammed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. Mohandas
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o Sivaraman
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Dinesh Pookayil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Tenancy Dispute Resolution
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Seeking enforcement of rights under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
Evidence:
Petition filed under Section 11(3) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Tenancy dispute under Rent Control Act
Case Code
Case between Thitheemu et al vs K. Mohandas regarding tenancy dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Thitheemu et al vs K. Mohandas regarding tenancy dispute

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 12/21/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 12/21/2016 - 12:00
From
Thu, 12/01/2016 - 12:00
To
Sat, 12/31/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Muhammed Faizal.P.T et al vs Sakeer Husain regarding rent control
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Beeran Haji vs Ali regarding rent control petition
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Vanaja Valliyil regarding Rent Control
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Ajith Kumar.U. regarding rent dispute
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Both (settled)
Case between Beeran Haji vs Habeeb Rehman regarding rent control
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won