Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 9 OF 2016

Case between Thitheemu et al vs K. Mohandas regarding tenancy dispute

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2016-12-21
Duration
Not mentioned
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Tenancy dispute between four petitioners seeking to enforce rights under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act was dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition filed by the petitioners under Section 11(3) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissing the petition as not pressed
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Thitheemu (60 years) Pallippat Thoomban House, Cheriyamundam Amsom, Desom and Post, Tirur Taluk Fathima Rooby (32 years) Pallippat Thoomban House, Cheriyamundam Amsom, Desom and Post, Tirur Taluk Muhammed Anwar (44 years) Pallippat Thoomban House, Cheriyamundam Amsom, Petitioners Desom and Post, Tirur Taluk Muhammed Ashraf (46 years) Pallippat Thoomban House, Cheriyamundam Amsom, Desom and Post, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

K. Mohandas (44 years) Kuttithara House, Naduvilangadi, Tirur Amsom, Desom and Post, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Tenancy Dispute Resolution
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Seeking enforcement of rights under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
Evidence:
Petition filed under Section 11(3) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 12/21/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases