Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.17 OF 2016

Case between Thitheemu et al vs I.P. Kunhimuhammed regarding rent control petition

Court
RENT CONTROLLER OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-01-03
Duration
Not mentioned
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners comprising Thitheemu, Fathima Ruby, Muhammed Anwar, and Muhammed Ashraf filed a petition under section 5(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control Act). The petition was dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition filed by the plaintiffs under section 5(1) of the Rent Control Act was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Clear
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Not clear from the document

Judgment Evidence:

Counsel for the petitioner not pressed the petition. Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Thitheemu (60 years) Kallan House, Cheriyamundam amsom, Thalakkadathoor desom & Post, Tirur Taluk Fathima Ruby (32 years) Pallippatt Thoomban House, Cheriyamundam amsom, desom, & Post, Tirur Taluk Muhammed Anwar (44 years) Pallippatt Thoomban House, Cheriyamundam amsom, desom, & Post, Tirur Taluk Muhammed Ashraf (46 years) Pallippatt Thoomban House, Cheriyamundam amsom, desom, & Post, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

I.P. Kunhimuhammed (Age not specified years) Illath Parambil House, Naduvilangadi, Tirur amsom, desom, Post & Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Not Decided
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Relief under section 5(1) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control Act)
Evidence:
Counsel for the petitioner not pressed the petition. Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases