Rent Control Petition No. 3 of 2016

Case between Thitheemu et al vs Aboobacker et al regarding lease and rent control

Court

Rent Controller of Tirur

Judge

Smt. Vincy.T.V.

Order Date

2016-12-21

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners filed a petition under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, seeking relief, but later withdrew the petition. The court dismissed the petition as it was not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Dismissed

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Petition filed under Section 5(1) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. Counsel for petitioner submitted that petition is not pressed and endorsed the same to that effect. Hence, the petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Thitheemu
Party Age: 60
Relation: Wife of Late Kunhimuhammed

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Fathima Rooby
Party Age: 32
Relation: Daughter of Late Kunhimuhammed

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Muhammed Anwar
Party Age: 44
Relation: Son of Late Kunhimuhammed

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Muhammed Ashraf
Party Age: 46
Relation: Son of Late Kunhimuhammed

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Aboobacker
Party Age: 58
Relation: Son of Moideen Haji

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Saidalu
Party Age: 54
Relation: Son of Moideen Haji

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Unknown

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Petition under Section 5(1) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965

Evidence:

Petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification