Case Summary
The petitioner, Theyyambattil Muhammed, seeks a final decree for partition based on a preliminary decree granted in 2009. The defendants contest the jurisdiction of the court to issue such a decree, claiming the property in question is Wakf property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the preliminary decree stands valid and that there is no evidence of the property being a Wakf property.
The court found that the preliminary decree stands valid and that there is no evidence of the property being a Wakf property.
Judgment Evidence:
Since there is nothing before me to substantiate that the preliminary decree passed is a nullity, I am inclined to proceed with the final decree application.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Chatheri Kunhimoideen (70 years years)
Tirur Taluk, Perumanna amsom, Kuruka desom
Chatheri Moideenkutty (67 years years)
Tirur Taluk, Perumanna amsom, Kuruka desom
Chatheri Muhammed kutty (61 years years)
Tirur Taluk, Perumanna amsom, Kuruka desom
Chatheri Ibrahim (56 years years)
Tirur Taluk, Perumanna amsom, Kuruka desom
Chatheri Hamza (53 years years)
Tirur Taluk, Perumanna amsom, Kuruka desom
Defendants
Chatheri Immutty (76 years years)
Perumanna amsom, Kuruka desom, Tirur Taluk
Chatheri Ayisamu (73 years years)
Perumanna amsom, Kuruka desom, Tirur Taluk
Chatheri Thithiru (70 years years)
Perumanna amsom, Kuruka desom, Tirur Taluk
Chatheri Mariyamu (68 years years)
Perumanna amsom, Kuruka desom, Tirur Taluk
Chatheri Sainaba (58 years years)
Perumanna amsom, Kuruka desom, Tirur Taluk