Case Summary
Thankamma Joseph filed a Rent Control Petition against Hariprasad V. Nair. The petition was dismissed as not pressed after both parties were represented in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The Rent Control Petition was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was not pressed by the petitioner.
The petition was not pressed by the petitioner.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was not pressed by the petitioner.
The petition was not pressed by the petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
The Counsel for the petitioner submits the Rent Control Petition is not pressed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the Rent Control Petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thankamma Joseph
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Michael Joseph
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hariprasad V. Nair
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Siby Mathew Thakadiyil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arun G
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K. P Sathyarathnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The Rent Control Petition is not pressed.
Evidence:
The Counsel for the petitioner submits the Rent Control Petition is not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thankamma Joseph vs Hariprasad V. Nair regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Thankamma Joseph vs Hariprasad V. Nair regarding Rent Control Petition