RCP NO: 9/2023

Case between Joseph George et al vs Mathew Thomas regarding Rent Control Petition

Court

THE COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER, PALA

Judge

Sri. Hasheem S

Order Date

2025-10-07

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition by Joseph George, Dr. Joseph Chandy, and Joseph Thomas against Mathew Thomas regarding a Rent Control matter. The petition was dismissed as not pressed after the respondent handed over the key of the shop room.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The Rent Control Petition was dismissed as not pressed after the respondent handed over the key.

Key Reasoning:
The respondent fulfilled the conditions which led to the dismissal of the petition.

Why Defendant Won:
The respondent fulfilled the conditions which led to the dismissal of the petition.

Supporting Evidence

Not pressed as the respondent handed over the key of the shop room.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the Rent Control Petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Joseph George
Party Age: 66
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Dr. Joseph Chandy
Party Age: 83
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Joseph Thomas
Party Age: 73
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mathew Thomas

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Kennedy M. George
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Gigi Thomas
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Seby Cherian
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

The Rent Control Petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Evidence:

the Rent Control Petition is not pressed as the respondent handed over the key of the shop room.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification