Case Summary
Thankamani filed a suit against Kelancheri Ganesan and Nanu for declaration and perpetual injunction. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default. (Pronounced by me in open court, this the 26th day of July, 2019).
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thankamani
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kelancheri Ganesan
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nanu
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. Shanmughan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. Vipin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The suit was for declaration and perpetual injunction.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The suit was for declaration and perpetual injunction.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thankamani vs Kelancheri Ganesan et al regarding declaration and perpetual injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Thankamani vs Kelancheri Ganesan et al regarding declaration and perpetual injunction