Case Summary
The plaintiff, Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank, represented by Vinoth J, filed a suit for the realization of money. The defendant, Antony.E and others, were also involved in the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found the plaintiff absent and consequently rejected the plaint as there was no representation from the plaintiff's side.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff absent no representation. BCF not remitted. No representation on his part also. Plaint rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank
- Relation
- Rep. by its Principal Officer Vinoth J
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Antony.E
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o.Egnatious
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sara
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o.Antony E
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sooranadu K.B.Madhusudhanan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vijayalekshmi C.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Chavara Sanoj Kumar R
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank vs Antony.E et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank vs Antony.E et al regarding realisation of money